Should I pay a recruitment agency or a paid application service in Switzerland?
Updated:
In short
Anyone who places people in jobs for payment in Switzerland needs an operating licence from the cantonal labour office, and what they may charge the job seeker is capped federally: at most CHF 45 as a registration fee, once per placement mandate, and at most 5 per cent of the first gross annual salary as commission. The commission is only owed once the placement has led to an employment contract. A service that writes your CV, coaches you or sends applications is not placement and falls under none of these limits.
This page explains the federal rules and is not legal advice. The cantonal labour office issues and withdraws the licences and is the authority for an individual case; anyone drawing unemployment benefit should clear a paid arrangement with their RAV adviser beforehand.
So the first question worth asking is which of the two is on offer. Placement means a licence, a written contract and two ceilings on what you can be charged. A paid application service means no licence, no public register, no legal ceiling on the price and no obligation that a job exists at the end of it, what you pay is whatever was agreed.
As at 18 September 2026, apprenticeships and internships excluded. The agency share is a floor: firms whose name does not reveal the business count here as employers.
- Placement for payment requires a cantonal licence; cross-border placement needs a federal one on top.
- Registration fee: CHF 45 maximum, charged once per placement mandate.
- Commission: 5 per cent of the first gross annual salary maximum, owed only after a contract is signed.
- In temporary staffing, any fee, advance payment or wage retention charged to the worker is void.
- Coaching and CV services are not placement, so none of these ceilings applies to them.
Two businesses that sound the same
The law recognises one activity. Whoever regularly and for payment places work in Switzerland, bringing job seekers and employers together so that employment contracts are concluded, needs an operating licence from the cantonal labour office. Placing people into or out of the country requires an additional licence from the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs.
Everything else sits outside that definition. A CV writing service, career coaching, a subscription that fires off applications in your name: none of them brings you together with a named employer to sign a contract, so none of them is placement. That is not a judgement about quality. It is a classification with consequences, because the whole protective machinery of the act hangs on it.
For a job seeker the practical effect is stark. The same invoice for a few hundred francs is a breach of a statutory ceiling in one case and a perfectly lawful price in the other. Asking which of the two businesses you are being sold tells you which rules are even in play.
What a licensed placer may charge you
The Federal Council sets the amounts, and they are low. The registration fee is at most CHF 45, for placement inside Switzerland and abroad alike, and may be charged only once per placement mandate. The ceiling holds even if the placer publishes your profile in a listing organ of its own. Where several placers work on the same mandate the fee may not be charged twice, and an unsuccessful mandate expires no earlier than six months on.
The placement commission is at most 5 per cent of the first gross annual salary. For a fixed-term engagement of up to twelve months it is calculated on the whole agreed gross wage instead. It falls due only once the placement has produced an employment contract, an invoice for effort that produced nothing has no statutory basis. VAT on the commission may be passed on to you even where that pushes the total past the ceiling.
Services agreed separately may be charged separately. The ordinance draws a line that matters in practice: that extra payment may not be set as a lump sum or as a percentage of salary. A package price for the placement itself therefore cannot be redescribed as a special service.
Clauses that are void by law
Paid placement has to be agreed in writing, and the contract has to name the services and the payment due for them. Two kinds of clause are expressly void: any that stop you approaching another placer, and any that oblige you to pay the placement fee again if you later conclude further contracts with the same employer without the placer's help.
Temporary staffing is stricter still. Where you are employed by a staffing firm and work in a client company, agreements that demand fees, advance financial contributions or wage retentions from you are void, as are agreements that prevent or hinder your transfer to the client company once the contract ends. If the staffing firm holds no licence, its employment contract with you is invalid, and the Code of Obligations governs what follows.
Void means the clause has no effect even though it was signed. What follows in a particular case is a question for the cantonal labour office or for legal advice, not for a website.
How to tell which one you are dealing with
The State Secretariat for Economic Affairs keeps a public directory of licensed private placement and staffing firms. It is freely searchable, and a firm that places people yet does not appear in it is worth a question, to the firm, or to the cantonal labour office that grants and withdraws the licences.
The second test is the contract. For paid placement, writing is not a courtesy but a requirement, and the text has to say what is being paid for. If what arrives instead is a form with a single lump sum, you can ask which line is the registration fee and which is the commission. The answer usually classifies the offer by itself.
The licence is cantonal, the ceilings are federal. Which office is responsible, and how quickly it acts, therefore varies from canton to canton. The CHF 45 and the 5 per cent do not.
Who actually advertises in the Swiss market
Agencies are highly visible in the market, and their adverts cost job seekers nothing. In our own listings at least about 12 per cent of open positions come from recognisable placement and recruitment firms rather than from the hiring employer, and the single largest advertiser is itself a recruitment firm with roughly 8 per cent of all adverts. Both figures as at 18 September 2026, with apprenticeships and internships excluded.
The share is a floor rather than a measurement of the whole. Firms are recognised by name, so an agency trading under a neutral one is counted here as an employer. The point holds either way: a substantial slice of advertised work is applied for through an agency in any case, and there the client, the company filling the post, is who pays.
That is why the question of paying rarely comes up. Employer-paid is the ordinary model in this market. An offer that asks you for money is not automatically disreputable, but it is the exception, and it deserves to be read as one.
What a paid arrangement does not promise
Neither the statute nor the contract obliges a placer to produce a job. What the law governs is the price and the timing: commission only after a contract, the fee only once, the mandate expiring no earlier than six months on. With a paid application service even that coupling is absent, you are buying the work, not the outcome.
Anyone drawing unemployment benefit has the RAV as well. The cantonal public employment service advises and places at no charge, and courses run through the adviser. Whether a private invoice makes sense in that situation is a question to raise there before signing rather than after.
The classification this page opens with remains the actual tool. Licensed placement with two ceilings on one side; a freely agreed service with no price limit at all on the other. Which of the two you are being offered is written in the contract.
Statutes read on 22 September 2026 on fedlex.admin.ch, the Recruitment Act (AVG/LSE) and its fee ordinance, in the versions in force, published in German, French and Italian. Advertiser shares from our own listings, as at 18 September 2026, apprenticeships and internships excluded.
Sources
- Recruitment Act (AVG), art. 2, 8 and 9, and art. 19 on staffing, German text
- Loi sur le service de l'emploi (LSE), French text of the same act
- Fee ordinance: registration fee and placement commission
- SECO directory of licensed private placement and staffing firms
- arbeit.swiss, the public employment service and the RAV
Related questions
What our job index says about the Swiss market
Computed live from our own index, not quoted from a study. Shares only, as of today.
Language the advert is written in
- Deutsch
- 60%
- English
- 23%
- Français
- 13%
- Italiano
- 3%
Of adverts that state a language requirement, the share asking for
- Deutsch
- 70%
- English
- 43%
- Français
- 21%
- Italiano
- 3%
19% posted in the last 7 days · Largest markets: Zürich 18% · Bern 10% · Genève 5% · Basel 5%